Why do you never hear about the Indian hotel ban against Chinese nationals?

The Hindustan Times report late last month that the Delhi Hotel and Restaurant Owners Association (DHROA) will not provide accommodation to Chinese nationals in light of the Galwan incident in early June is despicably racist and deserves universal condemnation, but few in the mainstream or alternative media would dare to do so because acknowledging the existence of non-Caucasian racism would debunk their weaponized false narrative against the US government that the only Examples of racism in history are Caucasians discriminating against non-Caucasians.

“Let us never lose sight of the fact that no race has an exclusive monopoly on racism,” the author advised his audience in early June as the Hybrid War on Terror against America began, for he strongly suspected that high-profile cases of non-Caucasian racism (whether against people of African descent or others) would soon be ignored by Western mainstream media because it doesn’t suit their weaponized narrative against the government American.

Many members of the Alt-Media community have also fallen for the lie that the only examples of racism in history are Caucasians discriminating against non-Caucasians, which was one of the reasons the author wrote that “The Alt-Media community has betrayed average Americans. By supporting antifa terrorism”.

Read more: Cornered India can’t expect Russian help after China’s humiliation: Andrew Korybko

Indian racism against Chinese ignored, but why?

“You can be an anti-imperialist, support African Americans, and also oppose terrorism,” but apparently few can see the gray between the black and white (pun intended) extremes of this question. Unfortunately, the unprecedentedly intense information war waged by both mainstream and alternative media (whether in tacit coordination with each other or simply as an uncoordinated coincidence) on their target audiences conditions to ignore the latest manifestation of Indian racism against the Chinese.

To recognize it as the racism it really is would discredit their carefully crafted false narrative that only Caucasians are capable of discriminating against people of other races. For this reason, it is not expected that serious outlets other than Chinese will probably talk about the following development.

Is the hotel ban part of the ‘boycott of Chinese products’ initiative?

According to The Hindustan Times late last month, “The Delhi Hotel and Restaurant Owners Association (DHROA) said on Thursday that Chinese nationals would not be accommodated in hotels and guesthouses owned by its members in the national capital”. They also reported that “its membership includes approximately 3,000 budget hotels and guesthouses across the city. The umbrella body said these facilities collectively have 75,000 rooms.

Their decision is apparently part of their effort to show solidarity with the de facto boycott of Chinese goods by their fellow jingoists, which is part of India’s unofficial gradual “decoupling” from China following the incident of Galvan. Regardless of the “reasoning” behind it, this decision is despicably racist and would be universally condemned as such if Caucasian American hoteliers refused to accommodate African Americans.

Russian media Sputnik reports, but for fear of being harassed

Given that the 1.3 billion non-African Chinese people are the targets of this racially discriminatory “business practice”, however, hardly a glance is given by the non-Indian media, except of Sputnik, funded by the Russian state, who was one of the very few reporting on it.

Even they did not condemn it as racist, perhaps because it is revealed at the very beginning of the article that it was published by their office in New Delhi who would not dare to call anything racist did their host country for fear of possibly being harassed by the authorities in response. Be that as it may, Sputnik has nonetheless committed an act of journalistic bravery in reporting on this development and thereby educating its international audiences about something they might otherwise never have heard of.

Read more: What the world can learn from India’s beating at the hands of China

Indian vs. Chinese Racism: What Kind of Dilemma Does the Alternative Media Face?

Returning to the “politically correct” but factually false narrative that the only examples of racism in history are Caucasians committing such acts against people of non-Caucasian descent, the bulk of those in the Alt-Media community who subscribe to such a counterfactual view of history are generally favorable to China.

This places them in a dilemma where they can either ignore the previously mentioned example of classic racism committed by Indians against Chinese in New Delhi and thus refuse to stand in solidarity with the victims, or take a stand in their favor but then challenge the dogma that they were previously indoctrinated into believing that Caucasians were the only people capable of racism and thus risked being accused by their community gatekeepers of being a “racist”, a “fascist”, an “undercover cop” and/or a “foreign agent”.

The toxic hypocrisy of the Alt-Media community towards the issue of racism is completely out of hand, but it is testament to the fact that this community has been infiltrated by radical ideologues who have exploited it as a vehicle to further their intended ends.

Instead of being the community of freethinkers seeking refuge from the totalitarian groupthink of the mainstream media as it was founded to be, it has evolved into a near-replica of that exact same structure that does not employs only different slogans and is dedicated to discrediting and ultimately destabilizing the US government instead of “legitimizing” and supporting it.

Acknowledging the objective existence of Indian racism against the Chinese, as evidenced by the DHROA’s despicably racist policy, could, the Guardians fear, open the door to recognizing African-American versus Caucasian racism as well.

This, however, can in no way be allowed, as it would debunk their fake weaponized narrative that is currently being used to instigate an escalating Hybrid War against the US government.

Read more: Why India needs China to stop itself from imploding

It is impossible for the Guardians to accept the existence of non-Caucasian racism, as that would amount to acknowledging that Trump supporters have always been right, which in turn would weaken their coordinated information warfare attack. against the president and – as they see it – “would side with racists, fascists, undercover cops and foreign agents” whom they are convinced are the only ones opposing their plot to change regime.

Never mind that 1.3 billion Chinese are discriminated against by hoteliers in New Delhi, as they see it as a “cost worth paying” to continue their anti-American campaign.

Andrew Korybko is a political analyst, radio host and regular contributor to several online media. This article first appeared on “One World: Global Think Tank” under a different title and has been republished with the author’s permission. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Global Village Space.

Christina A. Kroll